Oden Optical Co. v. Optique Du Mond, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Judge.
The circuit judge quashed service of process and dismissed this case without prejudice after the appellee argued the service was by “trick, artifice or fraud.” The appellant contends the service should not have been quashed and that the case should not have been dismissed. We are unable to find in this case any “trick, artifice or fraud” of the kind sufficient to invalidate the service and thus we reverse the decision to quash and remand the case.
Mr. Mourot, president of the appellant, and Mr. Blount and Mr. Fox, officers of the appellee, had engaged in telephone…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commercial Mutual Accident Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Robinson v. BossingerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Joseph Buchanan and Eva Buchanan v. Jack WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Freybergh v. GeliebterNew York Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tmf Tool Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant, and Jack Joseph and Joseph & Myers, Cross-Appellants v. Hans Muller, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- K Mart Corp. v. Gen-Star Industries Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
- CITREXSA, SA v. LandsmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Roberts v. PowersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992