Legal Opinion

Consolidated Pacific Engineering, Inc. v. Greater Anchorage Area Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1977No. 2538PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, Justice.

In this appeal we consider whether the superior court has jurisdiction to order the consolidation of two arbitrations which have questions of law or fact in common. In this instance one party objects to the consolidation. The agreements to arbitrate say nothing concerning consolidation.

In 1972 and 1973, the Greater Anchorage Areá Borough (GAAB) entered contracts with Consolidated Pacific Engineering, Inc. (Consolidated Pacific) to design, and Locher Company (Locher) to construct, a Career Center building for the GAAB School District. Each contract required claims or disputes…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. University of Alaska v. Modern Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Nizinski v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'n, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. In re the Arbitration between Vigo Steamship Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Grover-Dimond Associates, Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Hudik-Ross, Inc. v. 1530 Palisade Ave. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Litton Bionetics, Inc. v. Glen Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. BALFOUR, GUTHRIE AND COMPANY, LIMITED v. Commercial Metals Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Powers v. United Services Automobile Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. W. J. Megin, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Pueblo of Laguna v. Cillessen & Son, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API