Legal Opinion

Brill v. Hedges

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 20, 1991No. C-2-90-0701PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KINNEARY, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court to consider the cross motions of the parties for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. On June 24, 1991, the Court issued an Opinion and Order that, while accepting the Defendants’ contention that the statute at issue in this case is only subject to the lowest level of constitutional scrutiny, directed the parties to re-brief the issue of whether the statute is rationally related to any legitimate state interest. Both parties have now filed supplemental briefs with the Court.

FACTS

The undisputed facts in this case…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haffey v. TaftDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
  2. Kindhearts for Charitable Humanitarian Development, Inc. v. GeithnerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API