Legal Opinion

Halley v. M'Cargo

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 20, 1816PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Owsjjey.

This is a writ of error prosecuted by Halley to reverse a judgment recovered against him in an action of assumpsit brought by- M’Cargo in the court below.

The declaration contains hut one count, and that is in indebitatus assumpsit for money had and received by Halley to the use of M’Cargo. The trial was had on issues to. the pleas of non assumpsit, and the statute of limitations j apd after a verdict found in favor of M’Cargo, the motiop of Halley for a new trial was over-ruledand judgment entered according to the verdict.

Upon the refusal of the court to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steele v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Society of Shakers v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Fleet v. HollenkempCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1852
  3. Clements v. EslavaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1837

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API