Legal Opinion

Nagel v. Hopingardner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1971No. 403PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAM D. JOHNSON, Justice.

Trespass to try title suit. The appellees, O. E. Hopingardner and wife brought suit for title by limitation under the ten-year statute, Art. 5510, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ. St. The suit was brought against the record owner of the tract, Gilbert H. Nagel and against Clarence Nagel and Mrs. Pearl Nagel Barrow, appellants. The action involved a five-acre tract located in the northern part of the City of Houston designated as Lot 69, Aldine Gardens.

This same case was previously tried and submitted to a jury in December, 1969. At such trial the jury was unable to agree and the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McCardellTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Bruni v. VidaurriTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Richey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Boone v. City of StephenvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Amberson v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wolgamot v. CorleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Auchterlonie v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API