Legal Opinion

Andrew Bryant Sheets v. Michael Kyle Martin and Lauren Hertz

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided January 9, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00444Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION ANDREW BRYANT SHEETS, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2:25-cv-444-SPC-NPM MICHAEL KYLE MARTIN and LAUREN HERTZ, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are two motions to dismiss—one filed by Lauren Hertz with an accompanying memorandum of law (Docs. 54, 55) and one filed by Deputy Michael Kyle Martin (Doc. 56). Plaintiff Andrew Sheets, proceeding pro se,1 responded to each motion. (Docs. 57, 58). For the reasons below, the Court grants the motions. 1 Although Plaintiff is proceeding without a lawyer, he is no stranger…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Grider v. City of Auburn, Ala.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Danny M. Bennett v. Dennis Lee HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API