Legal Opinion

Salvaggio v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1923No. Appeal, No. 14PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The action was in assumpsit upon a policy of life insurance. The disputed issue of fact was whether the semiannual premium falling due on January 19, 1918, had been paid within the grace period of thirty-one days thereafter or not. If not, the policy lapsed and was not in force when the insured, plaintiff’s son, died, on March 16,’ 1918. The plaintiff asserted that she had paid it to *596the company’s agsut, Scudato, on February 11, 1918. He denied it and said it had not been paid until February 250 1918, when the policy was no longer in force and could only be revived upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Dominco v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Clapp v. VellnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klopik v. General American Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API