Legal Opinion · Dissent

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Coppola

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 29, 2011No. Misc. Docket AG No. 5, September Term, 2010Published

1Dissent

MURPHY, J., dissenting in which BELL, C.J., joins.

If I were persuaded that the Respondent had engaged in a “pattern of misconduct” within the meaning of ABA Standard 9.22(c), I would not dissent from the decision to disbar. I am persuaded, however, that this Court should overrule Bar Counsel’s exception to the hearing judge’s “failure” to find that the Respondent engaged in a “pattern of misconduct,” as that term has been interpreted by the Supreme Court of Oregon in In re Redden, 842 Or. 393, 153 P.3d 113, 114-15 (2007), and by the Supreme Court of Arizona in In re Levine, *412174 Ariz. 146,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReddenOregon Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API