Legal Opinion
Wmoz, Inc., and Edwin H. Estes v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 25, 1965No. 18742PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Here the only question of substance involves the Commission’s refusal to reopen the record for the taking of evidence which the appellants claimed was newly discovered and of decisional significance.
The appellants in this court have challenged the Commission’s Decision and Order released February 4, 1964 denying the application for renewal of the standard broadcast station license of WMOZ, Inc. at Mobile, Alabama, revoking the license of Estes for standard broadcast station WPFA at Pensacola, Florida, and denying the appellants’ petition to reopen the record for the taking of additional…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Federal Communications Commission v. Woko, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
3Cited by6 opinions
- Webr, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Florian R. Burczynski, Etc., D/B/A Ultravision Broadcasting Co., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Hudson River Fishermen's Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Eagle Broadcasting Company and Wtvy, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Cosmos Broadcasting Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Gordon County Broadcasting Company (Wcga) v. Federal Communications Commission, John C. Roach, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Hudson River Fishermen's Association v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.