Legal Opinion

Miner v. Miner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Saginaw. (Edget, J.) Bill to set aside a conveyance made in consideration of the care and support of complainants. Complainants .appeal. The facts are .stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is a bill filed to set aside a conveyance made to defendants in 1889 in consideration of an agreement for care and support. The conveyance ■was absolute, but at the same time a contract was entered *45into and conditioned for care and support. Defendants filed a cross-bill, praying for the reformation of the-contract.

The opinion of the learned circuit judge who heard the causes below sets forth so fully and forcibly the facts- and our conclusions therefrom that we adopt it:

“The proofs taken in these causes disclose that the complainants, Milo and Sallie J., are husband and wife, the former…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. F. A. Buck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Priebe v. SetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Nelson v. EichoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API