Legal Opinion

Alford v. Claborne

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1934No. 3 Div. 68PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

We are persuaded — all other matters to one side as of no controlling importance — that the cross-appeal presents the meritorious question in the case, and one which determines the substantive rights of the parties.

The chancellor, in the first decree rendered, sustained demurrer to the bill, upon the theory that the decree of the probate court setting aside exemptions to the widow of William Jackson, deceased, was valid and sufficient to vest in her the absolute title thereto under section 7948, Code 1923.

The bill alleges that ia 1928 William Jackson died in Escambia county,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Barnewall v. MurrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Keenum v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Harrington v. State Ex Rel. Van HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Craig v. RootSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Boyd v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Bank of Columbia v. McElroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API