Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moser v. East St. Louis & Interurban Water Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 16, 1945No. Term No. 44M6Published

1DissentStone, P. J.

I am unable to reconcile my own- conclusions in this case with those expressed in the majority opinion. I, therefore, respectfully dissent from said opinion.

The record discloses that the accident in question occurred on North Twenty-eighth street in Belleville. This street runs north and south and is 24 feet wide from curb to curb. It was still daylight, toward evening, and plaintiff with other children was playing a game known as “5-10,” which is rather vaguely described as being played as follows: “five-ten, no stop, no pushing, no running, red light halt, no steps.” Plaintiff’s testimony…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walldren Express & Van Co. v. KrugIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Heimann v. KinnareIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Jones v. StanderferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  4. Koehler v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  5. Soens v. Chicago, Wilmington & Vermilion Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API