Legal Opinion

Leitch v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided October 22, 1982No. TC 1557PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLISLE B. ROBERTS, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from the Department of Revenue’s Order No. I 81-59, affirming the act of the department’s auditor in assessing the plaintiffs for Oregon personal income tax deficiencies in the tax years 1976, 1977 and 1978. The deficiencies arose from the understatement by plaintiffs of income taxes for those years by “converting” Federal Reserve Notes received to specie dollars (i.e., those related to gold and silver coin). Plaintiffs contend that gold and silver are the only measures of money defined in the United States Constitution. They do not contend that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Hatfield v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  3. Lane County v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Juilliard v. GreenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Leitch v. State, Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leitch v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Mendonca v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API