Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Casualty Insurance v. Vanidestine

District Court, D. Maine

Decided October 7, 1997No. Civ. 96-235-BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

BRODY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company (“MCIC”), brings this action for a declaratory judgment absolving it of its obligation to pay benefits pursuant to a disability income insurance policy (“the policy”) issued to Defendant, Thomas J. Vanidestine, Jr. (“Vanidestine”). Plaintiff contends that Defendant misrepresented a pre-existing medical condition in his policy application, and that such misrepresentation allows Plaintiff to rescind the policy. Defendant counterclaims, alleging violation of the Maine Unfair Trade Practices…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Velez-Gomez v. SMA Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Plummer v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
  3. American Home Assurance Co. v. IngeneriSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. Margaret Taylor v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Patrons Mutual Insurance v. RideoutSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API