State v. Blakely
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPieper, J.
This appeal arises out of Appellant Teresa Blakely’s1 conviction for accessory after the fact to a felony. Blakely was initially acquitted of murder. She was subsequently tried for accessory after the fact to a felony. On appeal, Blakely raises multiple claims arising under the due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, § 3 of the South Carolina Constitution, including: (1) the vindictive prosecution in this matter is barred; (2) the indictment for accessory after the fact to a felony following Blakely’s acquittal of murder violates due process;…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Montejo v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.