Legal Opinion

State v. Blakely

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 10, 2013No. Appellate Case No.2011-196627; No. 5114Published

1Opinion of the CourtPieper, J.

This appeal arises out of Appellant Teresa Blakely’s1 conviction for accessory after the fact to a felony. Blakely was initially acquitted of murder. She was subsequently tried for accessory after the fact to a felony. On appeal, Blakely raises multiple claims arising under the due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, § 3 of the South Carolina Constitution, including: (1) the vindictive prosecution in this matter is barred; (2) the indictment for accessory after the fact to a felony following Blakely’s acquittal of murder violates due process;…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Montejo v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API