Legal Opinion
Cindy L. S. v. David L. S.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 17, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated July 3, 1996, which granted the petition for an order of protection.
Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.
Although the order of protection has expired, we have addressed the merits of the husband’s appeal from that order, since enduring consequences may flow from an adjudication that he has committed a family offense (see,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bickwid v. DeutschNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Cutrone v. CutroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Tibichrani v. DebsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Platsky v. PlatskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Grossman v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hogan v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Doino v. CartelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Exum v. SimsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998