Legal Opinion

Cutrone v. Cutrone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 25, 1996PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*768Although the order of protection excluding the appellant from the family residence has expired, in light of the enduring consequences which may potentially flow from an adjudication that a party has committed a family offense, we find that this appeal is not academic (see, Matter of Bickwid v Deutsch, 87 NY2d 862; Matter of Williams v Cornelius, 76 NY2d 542). However, we find no basis to disturb the Family Court’s determination that the appellant harassed his wife and daughter in violation of a previous order of protection. The question of whether the appellant committed acts of harassment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bickwid v. DeutschNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Merola v. MerolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Williams v. CorneliusNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Bart v. BartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Rogers v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In re Joshua B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Hunt v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Stone v. StoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re Er-Mei Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Wissink v. WissinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API