Husar v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
The appellant was convicted in the United States Court for China upon an information charging, in one count the felonious destruction, and in another the corrupt disposition, of a bound volume of documentary evidence which had come into his possession in the course of an official investigation he, as United States attorney, was called upon to make of the conduct of the person to whom he corruptly delivered the documents.
The first question is of the sufficiency of the record to disclose jurisdiction in the trial court, which, like that of other United States courts, is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- State ex rel. Perine v. Van BeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- State v. TrumpfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. RosnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Archer v. HeathCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Casement v. SquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Casement v. SquierDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1942
- In Re YokoyamaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.