Keeley v. Keeley
Oregon Supreme Court
From Clatsop: James A. Eakin, Judge. In Banc. This is a suit for divorce. Upon the trial there was a decree dismissing the suit and plaintiff appeals. The facts of the case, as far as they are necessary to an understanding of the case, will be found in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBenson, J.
This, being a proceeding in equity, is before us for a trial de novo, upon the record as it is presented to us. The husband is the plaintiff. The wife made no appearance. The district attorney filed no pleading of any sort, but appeared personally at the trial. The plaintiff was there represented by Will H. Bard as his attorney. The only proof of service of the notice of appeal is the affidavit of the plaintiff, and is in the following form:
*598“I, Lee Boy E. Keeley, being duly sworn, depose and say: That I am plaintiff and attorney for plaintiff in the above entitled cause; that on the 21st day…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones Land & Livestock Co. v. SeawellOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Muckle v. Columbia CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Williams v. SchmidtOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- De Foe v. De FoeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Everding & Farrell v. Gebhardt Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mangus v. Progress Quarries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Lahey v. LaheyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Moltzner v. CutlerOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Curtis v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1963