Lahey v. Lahey
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The point urged by plaintiff upon appeal is that of alleged error because of the court’s order vacating its decree.
The decree in the case at bar was rendered, entered and set aside at the same term of the Circuit Court. The decree vacated was based upon a complaint that was insufficient to sustain a decree annulling a bigamons marriage.
It is a well-established legal principle that judgments and decrees remain under the control of the court which gave them, throughout the *149term at which they are made and entered of record. This rule is familiar law in Oregon, and the authorities are collected…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Deering v. QuiveyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Goldberg, Bowen & Co. v. Stablemen's Local 8760California Supreme Court · 1906
- First Christian Church v. RobbOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Ayers v. LundOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Zelig v. Blue Point Oyster, Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Finch v. Pacific Reduction & Chemical Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Koennecke v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Blanchard v. MakinsterOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Swint v. SwintOregon Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.