Legal Opinion

Kinnebrew v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 13, 1902PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal feom Jackson Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. J. A. Bilbro. Tlie defendant was convicted of robbery and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

— An indictment proceeds from and is the act of the grand jury and to give it validity no function of the solicitor is necessary.—Joyner v. State, TS Ala. 448. Whether his appointment was valid or not the mere fact that the solicitor appeared without more before the grand jury when the indictment was found did not affect- the validity of the indictment, and, therefore, the motion to quash did not raise the question of his eligibility for appointment.

Bobbery being an offense which may be punished capitally a judgment of conviction therefor cannot be upheld on appeal unless the record shows-…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Hardley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Benton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Harper v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API