Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Joan Sherfel v. Reggie Newson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 30, 2014No. 12-4285Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStranch, Circuit Judge

Congress understood that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and similar state leave laws like the Wisconsin Family and Medical Leave Act (WFMLA) serve separate but complementary roles in governing employment leave. By honoring the distinction between accrued paid leave and other types of non-accrued benefits, like short-term and long-term disability benefits, these federal and state statutes have co-existed for nearly twenty-five years, each serving its particular purpose. The distinctions I draw here preserve that balance and allow…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API