Comegys v. State

HARPER, Judge.

This is the second appeal in this case, the opinion on the former appeal being reported in 62 Texas Crim. Rep., 231, 137 S. W. Rep., 349. The facts are sufficiently stated on the former appeal to render it unnecessary to state them again.

There is but one bill of exceptions in the record, and that relates to the admissibility of certain testimony elicited from the prosecuting witness, John Beed, on redirect examination. This witness had testified on direct examination to an unprovoked assault on him by appellant on the morning of the difficulty; that he was unarmed, and when…