Legal Opinion

People v. Haker

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1987No. Docket 91997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Should defendant be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea after sentencing because a conviction used as a predicate offense was constitutionally infirm due to the lack of counsel?

This issue of first impression arises on the following facts.

Defendant was not represented by an attorney in proceedings pertaining to his September 5, 1984, misdemeanor conviction for operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (ouil), second offense. MCL 257.625(5); MSA 9.2325(5). Subsequently, on December 9, 1985, defendant pled guilty to a felony charge of ouil, third offense, MCL 257.625(6); MSA…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. People v. JaworskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Masters v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. TuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Matheson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. YostMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. YostMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API