Legal Opinion

People v. Yost

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1989No. Docket 84701PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This defendant has been charged with being a second offender under the statute that proscribes operating a vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor. His earlier conviction was entered after he pled guilty. In the present case, the district court held that the defendant did not receive the necessary advice prior to the earlier plea of guilty. For that reason, the district court has determined that the earlier plea-based conviction cannot be employed to enhance the charge in the present case. We find that the defendant’s earlier plea was preceded by adequate advice, and we therefore…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. In Re Guilty Plea CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. Al-SharaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. People v. IngramMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. HarrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People of Michigan v. Marcus McCannMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. People v. Al-SharaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API