Legal Opinion

Central Trust Co. of New York v. Cincinnati, J. & M. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio

Decided November 1, 1892No. 975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity. Bill to foreclose a railroad mortgage. Heard on questions as to distribution of the proceeds of sale.

1Opinion of the Court

TAFT, Circuit Judge.

Complainant exhibited its hill praying for foreclosure of two mortgages upon the property of the Cincinnati, Jackson & Mackinaw By. Company, and a sale of the road. Decrees of foreclosure and sale have been passed, the entire corpus of the defendant company has been sold, and the sale confirmed. The questions now to be decided arise upon distribution, and are presented on two motions to that end, made by certain intervening judgment creditors, whom we may shortly call Schaffer ct al. The defendant company was a consolidation of the Jackson & Ohio Railroad Company, owning…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Wood v. Guarantee Trust and Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Ketchum v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Dodge v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Camden v. MayhewSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Deputy v. Delmar Lumber Manufacturing Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1913
  2. McEwen v. Harriman Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  3. Lowish v. First Nat. Bank of MariettaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  4. First Nat. Bank of Chattanooga v. Radford Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  5. First Nat. Bank of Chattanooga v. Radford Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API