Legal Opinion
In Re Gianulias
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California
Decided March 21, 1989No. 19-90090PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION
CHRISTOPHER M. KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Counsel has applied for reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services as authorized by 11 U.S.C. § 330. The application is being denied without prejudice for failure to adduce competent evidence on reasonable hourly rates.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Counsel was authorized to be employed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 327. At that time the court did not approve any specific rates for compensation on an hourly basis pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 328(a). Instead, the question of reasonable compensation for actual,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ellis v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Nucorp Energy, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and Its Affiliates, Debtors. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & ScrippsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Rita A. Toth, and Sondra J. Thornally, Esq., Claimant-Appellant v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- In Re RheubanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1990
- In Re GireUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1989
- In Re GianuliasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1989
- In Re SillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.