Legal Opinion

Deavenport v. Green River Dep. Bank

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 13, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

CASE 48 — ACTION ON A NOTE BY THE GREEN RIVER DEPOSIT'BANK AGAINST S. A. DEAVENPORT AND ANOTHER AND 'W. M. BROIWN IN WHICH W. M. 'BROWN PILED AN ANSWER AND CROSS PETITION AGAINST HIS CO-OBLIGORS. Appeal from Butler Circuit Court. McKenzie Moss, Circuit Judge. Judgment for plaintiff and for cross petitioner, and Deavenport and another appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

by¥m. Rogers Clay,

Commissioner — Affirming.

Appellants, S. A. Deavenport and others, and appellee, W. M. Brown, purchased of High Smith Bros., of Illinois, a Berman coach horse. The purchase price was $2,200. They executed to High Smith Bros, one note for $734, dated November 29, 1905, and payable on or before the 1st day of September, 1907. Eor the balance they executed two notes payable at a later day. These notes were discounted by appellee, Breen River Deposit Bank, before maturity. After the purchase of the notes by the bank, it sold a half interest in them to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. WanseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Logan County National Bank v. BarclayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Easton v. Strother & ConklinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Gardner v. SalyersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  2. Thomas v. SchmelzerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Melton v. Pensacola Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  4. Ristine v. RumlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. City Nat'l Bank of Paducah v. Ex. Bank MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API