Home Indemnity Company v. West Trade Motors, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
Before Crockett could recover, lie would have to establish dealer’s liability. This liability exists, Crockett asserted and the court approved, because dealer was the owner of the Mercury coupe used by Bradshaw with dealer’s permission on 4 November 1961. The contention is based on the interpretation Crockett places on our decision in Credit Co. v. Norwood, 257 N.C. 87, 125 S.E. 2d 369.
We repeat what Justice Jackson so well said in Armour & Co. v. Wantock, 323 U.S. 126, 89 L. ed. 118: “It is timely again to remind counsel that words of our opinions are to be read in the light of the facts of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Howard v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Community Credit Co. of Lenoir, Inc. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- In Re the Will of PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- International Serv. Ins. Co. v. Iowa Nat. Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- International Service Insurance v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- International Service Insurance v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Mitchell v. Univ. of N.C. Bd. of GovernorsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025