Legal Opinion

Coppinger v. Coppinger

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 7, 1954No. 17184PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

This matter involves divorce proceedings, wherein the parties, appearing in reverse order in the trial court, will herein be designated as plaintiff and defendant.

On the evening of May 1, 1951, following a family altercation, and after a call by plaintiff to the Durango police department, defendant, in custody of officers, left the place where he and plaintiff had been living at 868 Third Avenue, Durango, Colorado. Upon being released on the following day he did not return to his apartment and his then whereabouts were unknown to plaintiff. May 17, 1951, plaintiff commenced her action for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Croyle v. CroyleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Liebhant v. LawrenceUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  3. O'Rear v. LazarusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  4. Medina v. MedinaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  5. Morton v. MortonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Rael v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. Weber v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  5. Owens v. TergesonColorado Court of Appeals · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API