Legal Opinion

Cornett v. Nathan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1976No. 40355PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

This is an action for the collection of a real estate commission allegedly due the plaintiff, a real estate broker, from the defendants. The District Court granted summary judgment to the defendants. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

The plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, entered into a listing agreement with the defendants, who desired to sell certain realty. The defendants promised to páy the plaintiff a 7 percent commission for his services, and the defendants listed their property for $349,700. The plaintiff presented the defendants with a potential buyer who offered the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Wisnieski v. CoufalNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Huston Co. v. MooneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Lincoln Realty Co. v. Garden City Land & Immigration Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Felthauser v. GreebleNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zitzelberger v. SalvatoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Fleming Realty & Ins., Inc. v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dworak v. MichalsNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Don J. McMurray Co. v. WiesmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Goetz v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API