Legal Opinion

State v. Bolin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 19, 2008No. 26494PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Respondent was indicted for murder, assault and battery with intent to kill, possession of a firearm during commission of a violent offense, assault with intent to kill, discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle, and possession of a pistol by a person under 21 years of age pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 16-23-30 (2003 & Supp.2007).

Respondent argued that the possession of a pistol indictment should be quashed because § 16-23-30(B) under which he was charged is unconstitutional. The motion to quash was granted by the trial court. The State appeals and we affirm.

ISSUE

Did the trial court err by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. GasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Robertson v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Benjamin v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Rock Hill v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. State v. Max MischSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  5. State v. Max MischSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API