Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State Board of Elections

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided February 1, 1988No. Civ. A. No. C-87-0177-BG(M)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MEREDITH, District Judge.

The above-styled action was filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, requesting that this Court declare KRS 116.055 as null and void, of no effect and unconstitutional. As further relief, the plaintiffs requested that the named defendants, their agents and employees, be enjoined and/or restrained from enforcement of said statute or from otherwise prohibiting the plaintiffs from voting in the upcoming Presidential preferential primary and regular primary elections of March 8, 1988 and May 24, 1988, respectively.

The plaintiffs contend that provisions…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Libertarian Party v. Alison Lundergan GrimesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2016
  2. Crum v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Crum v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API