Carey v. Town of Westmoreland
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, C.J.
The issue in this zoning appeal is whether it is unjust and unreasonable for the defendant town to require the plaintiffs to install a septic tank system on their premises when the plaintiffs have in use a system which meets all the requirements of State regulations and poses no health hazard. We hold that the town’s action is unreasonable.
The plaintiffs are Quakers who, in May of 1977, purchased 11.4 acres of land in the town of Westmoreland (town). They constructed a home in accordance with their religious beliefs and the doctrine of simplicity in living. The home has no utilities: no…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Metzger v. Town of BrentwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Cook v. Town of SanborntonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Carbonneau v. Town of ExeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Ouimette v. City of Somersworth & Agway Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Durant v. Town of DunbartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Sprague v. Town of AcworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Shaw v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Slater v. Planning Board of Town of RumneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Town of Milford v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982