Legal Opinion
Healey v. Chelsea Resources Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 24, 1990No. 88 Civ. 6957 (RLC)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
“0 accurst craving for gold.”
—Virgil, Aeneid, Bk. Ill, 1. 57 This case arises out of an ill-fated attempt to resurrect a historical Montana gold mine, the Spotted Horse. Investor-turned-plaintiff John A. Healey alleges violations of § 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 111(2), § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, common law fraud and negligent misrepresentation, and seeks rescission, damages, and punitive damages. Discovery…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- John A. Healey, Michael S. Press v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd., Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. And Dominick & Dominick, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Gache v. Town of Harrison, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re Quintel Entertainment Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Robbins v. Moore Medical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.