Legal Opinion

United States v. Rose

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 22, 1957No. 9641PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

In October 1955, the accused, Chief Machinist’s Mate Patrick W. Rose, was detailed as Petty Officer in Charge of the Forces Afloat Automobile Hobby Shop located on Navy Field in the City of San Diego, California. The Hobby Shop was patronized by service personnel desiring to do automobile repair work. Such personnel were furnished with space, tools and the advice and assistance of Navy personnel assigned to this duty. When the required work was beyond the capacity of the individual patron, arrangements were made with commercial garages to perform the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GunnelsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Denzel Milton Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. OdenwellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  5. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API