Legal Opinion

Brunson v. Tatum

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 21, 2009No. COA08-386PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Petitioner Samuel Keith Brunson appeals from the superior court’s judgment upholding the decision of the Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”) cancelling petitioner’s conditional restoration agreement that had conditionally restored his driving privileges. Petitioner primarily argues that DMV erroneously concluded that he had violated that agreement by attempting to operate his truck after consuming alcohol. Petitioner does not dispute that he intended to drive his truck, that he had consumed cold medicine containing alcohol, that he blew into his truck’s ignition interlock device,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph County Planning BoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Gaston County Dyeing MacHine Co. v. Northfield InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Singleton v. Haywood Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cook v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. KISSLO v. TatumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. RomanoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API