Legal Opinion

Young v. Diedel

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 17, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The canse was submitted on briefs to Boyd, C. X, Briscoe, Thomas, Pattisox, Fewer, Stockbeidge, Adkins, and Opfutt, JX

1Opinion of the Court

Fewer, X,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The purchaser of the property decreed to be sold in this case excepted to the ratification of the sale, on the theory that the court was without jurisdiction to pass the decree. The appeal is from an order overruling the exceptions and ratifying the sale.

It was expressly determined by the decree that the real estate to which it referred could not he divided in kind among the parties to the cause, who owned the property as tenants in common, and the evidence in the ease fully justified that conclusion, but the hill of complaint omitted an allegation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Hamilton v. TraberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  3. Shipley v. FinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  4. Linthicum v. W.B. A. Elec. Rd. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. Johnson v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scott v. MardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Gibula v. SauseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  3. Birckner v. TilchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  4. Wathen v. BrownCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Bowers v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API