Legal Opinion

Willis v. Willis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 9, 2012No. 457A11PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSON, Justice.

Plaintiff Anthony Willis, on behalf of the estate of Janice Willis, seeks reformation of a deed based on unilateral mistake of the grantor in the absence of fraud. Because this remedy is unavailable as a matter of law, we modify and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Janice Willis had two sons, Eddie and Anthony. In December 2004 she drafted a will bequeathing “any interest that I may own in my home place” to Eddie. The will also expressed Mrs. Willis’s “wish” that, if she conveyed the property to Eddie before her death and he decided to sell it, Eddie would divide…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mims v. MimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Crawford v. . WilloughbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Parker v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Nelson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Irrevocable Trust Agreement of 1979Nevada Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Maldjian v. BloomquistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  3. Walter v. WalterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API