Legal Opinion

Arabie v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-3243-OPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

NAUMAN S. SCOTT, District Judge.

On May 17, 1988, the second day of trial of this case, we entered a directed verdict in favor of defendants, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (“Chevron”) and Noble Drilling Corporation (“Noble”), pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, dismissing all of plaintiff’s claims against defendants with prejudice. We now assign written reasons for our ruling.

FACTS:

Prior to June 29, 1986 plaintiff, Gregory Paul Arabie, was employed as a sales and service technician by Geolograph Pioneer, Inc. (“Geolograph”). Plaintiff’s duties included installing,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Longino v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API