Legal Opinion
Earls v. King
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 8, 1990No. 16382PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
This matter has previously been here. See Earls v. Farmers Production Credit Ass’n, 763 S.W.2d 694 (Mo.App.1988). That appeal was dismissed as there was no judgment. Following remand the trial court entered an order dismissing the claim of Troy Earls without prejudice pursuant to Rule 52.13 because no motion for substitution was made within 90 days of the first amended petition, which the trial court treated as a suggestion of death. Finding that Troy Earls and Mary Earls did not have “legal ability to sue” because of their bankruptcy the trial court dismissed the claim of Mary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Schneider v. StewartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Oakland Municipal Improvement League v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Zero Manufacturing Co. v. HuschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Anderson v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Crigler v. FrameMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Call v. HeardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- State ex rel. Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Balke v. Central Missouri Electric CooperativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Asmus v. Capital Region Family PracticeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Their Representative Capacity as Trustees for the Indian Springs Owners Ass'n v. GreevesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.