Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Mercedes v. La Sara Grain Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 31, 1984No. 13-81-2209-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GONZALEZ, Justice.

This cause was remanded to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court for us to consider the factual sufficiency of appel-lees’ evidence on attorney’s fees. La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of Mercedes, Texas, 673 S.W.2d 558 affirming in part and reversing in part, 646 S.W.2d 246 (Tex.1984).

In its twelfth point of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred in awarding appellees’ attorney’s fees for the reason that there was no evidence or insufficient evidence to support such damages. We initially note that the Supreme Court held that the testimony of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Braswell v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Magids v. DormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. First National Bank of Mercedes v. La Sara Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pegasus Energy Group, Inc. v. Cheyenne Petroleum Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  2. Gonzalez v. Nielson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  3. Security Bank v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. Pierce, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1989
  5. Javier Barrera Garcia v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API