Legal Opinion
Piechowski v. Matarese
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 13, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
54 N.J. Super. 549 (1959)
149 A.2d 632
WILLIAM J. PIECHOWSKI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRANK R. MATARESE ET ALS., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided March 13, 1959.
Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for the plaintiff (Messrs. Dimond, Haines & Bunting, attorneys).
Mr. Burton Peskin argued the cause for the defendants (Messrs. Fishberg & Peskin, attorneys).
McGANN, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
This matter comes before the court on an order to show cause as a result of a levy made pursuant to N.J.S. 2A:17-57 et seq.
The plaintiff seeks to obtain an order against Joseph F. Matarese,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beninati v. HinchliffeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- De Stefano v. American Chocolate Almond Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Winchell v. ClaytonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
- Rose v. BernhardtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
- Kiernan v. Kahn Davis, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- McGivern v. Amasa Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Nat. Cash Register Co. v. 6016 Bergenline Ave. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- American Express Co. v. VellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Citibank, South Dakota, N.A. v. CoffeyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994