Legal Opinion

Desjardins v. Emeralite Surfacing Products Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1933No. 29,622PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding in this court on petition by the defendant for a peremptory writ of mandamus to one of the judges of the district court of St. Louis county to compel him to grant a change of the place of trial of this action and to grant leave to amend defendant’s answer, after the trial court had heard and denied motions for such relief. An order to show cause why such relief should not be granted was issued by this court and the matter presented here on the petition, order to show cause, and record in the court below and the briefs of counsel for the respective parties.

Defenda…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dexner v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. State ex rel. Security State Bank v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vornbrock v. BolligSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Berg v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Allum v. Federal Cartridge Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API