Legal Opinion

Paradis v. Kirby

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 28, 1980No. 364-79PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This action was brought by plaintiffs, Paradis, to determine the boundary line between their property and the property of the defendants, Kirby. From a judgment favorable to the plaintiffs, defendants appeal. We affirm.

The facts found by the court disclose that in 1926 one Kobert Moorby owned land on Potash Bay in Lake Champlain. On July 6 of that year he conveyed two parcels, one to William Norton and one to Belle Norton. The William Norton parcel was bounded on the west by the easterly boundary of the parcel conveyed that day to Belle Norton. It was bounded on the east by land of one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Monti v. Town of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  2. Tallarico v. BrettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  3. Parrow v. ProulxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  4. Monet v. MerrittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Nevitt v. NevittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Lanphere v. BeedeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Concra Corp. v. AndrusSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. In Re John L. Norris TrustSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API