Legal Opinion

Leahmer v. McCullough

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 6, 1917No. 20,511Published

Appeal from Finney district court; George J. Downer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff purchased a promissory note made to and indorsed by A. E. Hostetler, who, upon suit being brought, alleged that he was not liable, having indorsed without recourse. When the note was purchased the first three lines on the back thereof were:

“A. E. Hostetler.
“Without recourse
“M. E. Long.”

The court permitted the payee to testify that he had written the words “Without Recourse” under his name. The plaintiff appeals and contends that this was error for the reason that the usual mode of indorsement without recourse is for the words to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hatch v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Corbett v. FetzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Goolrick v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. President of Fitchburg Bank v. GreenwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API