Legal Opinion

Arick v. City of Worcester

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 24, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of tort for damages sustained by the plaintiff because of water flowing into his cellar. The plaintiff’s declaration alleged that on November 3, or 4, 1927, the merchandise stored in the basement of the premises occupied by him was damaged by rain, water and dirt which flowed into said cellar by reason of the failure of the defendant properly to care for, maintain and keep free from obstruction, the sewers, catch basins and ways adjacent to the property occupied by the plaintiff. The answer of the defendant was a general denial. Upon the conclusion of the evidence, on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Bates v. Inhabitants of WestboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Pevear v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harvard Furniture Co. v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Lobster Pot of Lowell, Inc. v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  3. LaFrance Industries v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Miles Plumbing & Heating Co. v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API