Legal Opinion

Town of Gay Head v. Stutz

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 27, 1994No. Dukes93-0112Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcHugh, J.

The impetus for this case is the Gay Head Selectmen’s November 22, 1993 reconstitution of the Gay Head Zoning Board of Appeals (“the Board”). As reconstituted, the Board did not include three long-time members. Here and in Federal Court, the three claim that their absence from the reconstituted Board stems from the Selectmen’s disagreement with conditions the three had imposed on their approval of an application for a comprehensive permit filed by a local housing authority under G.L. c. 40C, §23.

After the events of November 22, the three former Board members commenced an action in the United…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Interstate Engineering Corp. v. City of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Warner v. Selectmen of AmherstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Cambridge Housing Authority v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API