Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Landers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 15, 1925No. 4 Div. 231PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The points and facts are set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. Counsel for appellant concede that having purchased the property after the purported levy the return of the sheriff concludes him as to the facts therein set forth, and that he cannot now question the validity of the levy. He insists, however, that the levy was abandoned and the lien lost before he acquired the property, and as this fact is not set forth in the return it can be shown by parol and does not impeach the said return ; and we are inclined to agree as to this contention. ' In fact, there seems to be nothing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roman v. LentzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jawad v. GranadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. W. M. Templeton & Son v. DavidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Lindsay Products Corp. v. Alabama Securities Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Hart v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  5. First Nat. Bank of Littlefield v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API