Legal Opinion

Sweek v. Galbreath

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from "Washington County.

1Opinion of the Court

Thayer, J.,

By the Court, on motion for re-hearing: When the decision was made in this case, in which a re *517hearing is now sought to be had, I was very strongly impressed with the belief that, where a party to an action in a justice’s court was compelled, in order to maintain the action or a defense thereto, to prove title to real • property, he would, if plaintiff, fail to establish his case, and, if defendant, be precluded from proving his defense. The jurisdiction of a justice’s court does not extend to an action in which the title to real property comes in question; and I believed that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cox v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Malarkey v. O'LearyOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Marshall v. BurdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Heiney v. HeineyOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bennett v. ForrestDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1895
  5. Beall v. BeallOregon Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API